[gcc-4.3-20080125] Bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-openbsd4.2: missing sentinel in function call

[Dongsheng Song]

But the current xgcc in gcc 4.3 building issue the warning yet.

2008/1/31, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>:
> On Jan 30, 2008 7:38 PM, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > See: http://www.linuxonly.nl/docs/2/0_Page_1.html
>
>
> It says:
>  This is because NULL is not of the right type: it is defined as
>  integer 0 instead of a pointer with the value 0.
>
>  Except that is wrong from what the C99 standard says about the NULL macro:
>  The macros are
>  NULL
>  which expands to an implementation-defined null pointer constant
>
>  So no casting is needed as it is already a pointer type if we follow
>  the C99 standard (I think C90 says the same thing except I don't have
>  C90 in front of me).
>
>  Thanks,
>
> Andrew Pinski
>