Plugin Branch

[Emmanuel Fleury]

Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> Joe Buck wrote:
>> Nothing final has been decided.  There are some efforts under way of
>> finding ways to reassure RMS that it's possible to do plugins in a way
>> that doesn't open the door to unrestricted use of gcc internals by
>> proprietary compilers, so it would be counterproductive right now for
>> everyone to yell at RMS.  It would be even more counterproductive to
>> start an argument on this list, since the main decision-maker doesn't
>> read it.  Sorry about that.
> 
> Can we count on the fact that the SVN branch will be synced from time to
> time to the mainline ?

synchronized ...from... the mainline...

This might change a lot the meaning of my message. :-/

Regards (Doh!)
-- 
Emmanuel Fleury

Maître de conférence,        | Bureau: 261
LaBRI, Domaine Universitaire | Tél:    +33 (0)5 40 00 69 34
351, Cours de la Libération  | Mél:    emmanuel.fleury@labri.fr
33405 Talence Cedex, France  | Web:    http://www.labri.fr/~fleury