Idea to gain the time of wider testing.
Ben Elliston
bje@au1.ibm.com
Mon Feb 25 19:29:00 GMT 2008
On Fri, 2008-02-22 at 20:56 +0100, J.C. Pizarro wrote:
> I've ideas when there are repetitive processes as e.g. the testing processes.
>
> Q1. Why to lose time testing the same reiterated files that always had worked
> for many months or years?
To use an old expression, "past performance is no guarantee of future
performance". Just because a test has passed hundreds of times before
does not mean that a small change will not introduce a regression. In
my experience, sometimes regressions occur where I least expect them.
Ben
More information about the Gcc
mailing list