GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2008-02-14)
Joel Sherrill
joel.sherrill@oarcorp.com
Thu Feb 14 15:43:00 GMT 2008
Hi,
Any chance of someone with ARM knowledge dealing with
this issue before the branch is cut.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35071
Uros Bizjak thinks it is just a typo in an assembly file
but no one who has commented on this PR is comfortable
saying that.
> Just a wild guess, could this be a typo?
>
> [uros@localhost arm]$ grep do_itt *
> ieee754-df.S: do_itt eq
> ieee754-sf.S: do_itt eq
>
> However, we have:
>
> lib1funcs.asm:.macro do_it cond, suffix=""
>
> and many references to "do_it" macro in asm sources.
Thanks.
--joel
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Status
> ======
>
> We are in Stage 3 and the trunk is open for regression and documentation
> fixes only. We have reached our goal of zero open P1 regressions (in fact
> several times, but each time different P1s appeared), so 4.3.0 release
> candidate will be created early next week. There is still time to get
> important bugfixes into the release candidate. On Monday
> branches/gcc-4_3-branch will be created, and the trunk subsequently open for
> Stage 1 of 4.4. 4.3 branch will be afterwards frozen until the release
> candidate is created, any changes to the branch will require RM approval.
>
> Quality Data
> ============
>
> Progress has been made over the last 2.5 weeks, on P1 regressions
> as well as P2 regressions.
>
> Priority # Change from Last Report
> -------- -- -----------------------
> P1 0 - 2
> P2 74 - 14
> P3 4 + 2
> ----- -- -----------------------
> Total 78 - 14
>
> There are still 38 P4 and 91 P5 regressions, this is the last chance to get
> them fixed before the release candidate.
>
> Previous Report
> ===============
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-01/msg00507.html
>
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the Gcc
mailing list