Analyzing *-rtems* ACATS

[Joel Sherrill]

Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 15:07 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>   
>> Beyond those, I am left with:
>>
>> ============================================
>> All targets had the following three failures:
>>
>> c64005c - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH."
>> c64005d - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH."
>> c953002 - "WRONG ITERATIVE TRACE LENGTH."
>>     
>
> These are tests with recursion and local strings, could you
> try to run them with more stack for the main thread? (Or in some way
> look at their stack usage). I've never seen them fail on a native
> platform so this is a wild guess.
>
>   
Will do.  But the main thread has a 100K stack and these
didn't fail with 4.2.3 and the same settings.

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01028.html

I am not on the machine with the compiler so will have to
test this Monday.
> Laurent
>
>   


-- 
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill@OARcorp.com        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
   Support Available             (256) 722-9985