RFC: named address space support

[Andrew Pinski]

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 4:30 PM, Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com> wrote:
>  Our implementation only covers section 5.1 of the proposal (named
>  address space support).  Section 5.2 has not been implemented.

Is C++ supported?  I do know for that fixed point types, C++ is mostly
supported (except mangling and a couple others).
I think we should not be adding extension unless they are both
supported in the C and C++ front-ends.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski