GCC 4.3 release schedule

[Mark Mitchell]

Jason Merrill wrote:

> No.  Previously we've branched at <100 regressions, but waited for the
> numbers to get better than that before making the release.  I'm
> suggesting that the release criteria stay about the same as before, just
> that we delay the branch until the release is ready rather than have
> branch criteria and then release criteria.

Yes, that's what I'm imagining too, under this plan.  All we'd be doing
differently is delaying Stage 1 until after the release, instead of
parallelizing Stage 1 with the final release preparation.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713