From SSA back to GIMPLE
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@gmail.com
Thu Oct 25 04:00:00 GMT 2007
On 10/24/07, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> wrote:
> > We are also thinking about lowering GIMPLE a bit further and delay
> > the transition into RTL.
>
> Diego, can you be more specific about what parts you think have to be
> lowered more from GIMPLE?
TLS accesses for PIC mode is one example of where it would be nice to
rerun some CSE type for the function call (this would be able to get
rid of libcalls at this point).
Real address selection at the tree level, maybe a scheduler too.
-- Pinski
More information about the Gcc
mailing list