[testsuite gfortran] partial fix for secnds*.f
R. D. Flowers, Chattanooga TN USA
rd@chalice.us
Tue May 29 09:43:00 GMT 2007
Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
> On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:14:51PM +0000, R. D. Flowers, Chattanooga TN USA wrote:
>
>>>I think we should use parentheses to enforce the order.
>>
>>I could be missing something here, and it is almost separate statements,
>>and might be ugly, but -- comma clauses?
>>
>>foo=term1,foo+=term2,foo+=term3 ... ;
>
>
> <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html#nonbugs_c>
>
The link you supplied points to potential problems if there are
inadequate sequence points in the presence of side-effects. It doesn't
mention comma clauses, does it?
I do not see the problem when providing adequate sequence points ( what
AFAIK is the sole purpose of comma's in a statement -- comma clauses ),
and when the terms are constants or simple expressions (so no side-effects).
Am I missing something embarassingly obvious ( comma got removed from
the C standard or something )?
More information about the Gcc
mailing list