A reload inheritance bug

[Mark Shinwell]

Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Mark Shinwell wrote:
>> These dumps are of course taken before the application of my patch.
>>
>> Hope that helps,
> 
> Thanks.  I may have missed it in the previous mails, but which piece of
> code exactly decides to use R9 for reload 0 of insn 5314?

I'm afraid I'm not sure exactly -- but given that r9 is still deemed
to contain a valid reload, isn't that logic correct given the pseudo
register numbers in question?

Mark