GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)

[Jason Merrill]

Mark Mitchell wrote:

> I agree in principle -- much better the bugs we know than the ones we
> don't.  But, IIUC, the patch we'd be reverting is from March, 2006,
> which means that there's potentially a lot more that depends on it.  In
> that sense, I don't even feel confident that reverting the change is a
> conservative move, likely to lead to less optimal code, but not wrong
> code.  Are you?  (That's a serious question; not a rhetorical one.)

That's a fair question; I don't know anything about the patch or the bug 
it was intended to fix.  Richard would know better.

Jason