GCC 4.2.0 Status Report (2007-05-11)

[Paul Jarc]

Joe Buck <Joe.Buck@synopsys.COM> wrote:
> I don't even think this qualifies as a bug.  It's basically an
> enhancement request, to have a clean way of supporting glibc in
> an unusual place.

It works in previous versions going back to 2.95.3, so I'd think it
would be a bug, and a regression.  But since this is such a rare
circumstance, I wouldn't expect it to be a release-blocker.  I brought
it up only in the hope that it might be transparent to someone and
fixed before the release, but I certainly understand if it isn't.


paul