We're out of tree codes; now what?

[Steven Bosscher]

On 3/22/07, Doug Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com> wrote:
> The results, compile time:

For what test case?

> For a bootstrapped, --disable-checking compiler:
>
> 8-bit tree code (baseline):
>
> real    0m51.987s
> user    0m41.283s
> sys     0m0.420s
>
> subcodes (this patch):
>
> real    0m53.168s
> user    0m41.297s
> sys     0m0.432s
>
> 9-bit tree code (alternative):
>
> real    0m56.409s
> user    0m43.942s
> sys     0m0.429s

Did the 9-bit tree code include Alexandre Oliva's latest bitfield
optimization improvements patch
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01397.html)?

What about the 16-bit tree code?

Gr.
Steven