We're out of tree codes; now what?

[Brooks Moses]

Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 3/20/07, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>  I think it's fair for front ends to pay for their
>> largesse.  There are also relatively cheap changes in the C++ front end
>> to salvage a few codes, and postpone the day of reckoning.
> 
> I think that day of reckoning will come very soon again, with more
> C++0x work, more autovect work, OpenMP 3.0, and the tuples and LTO
> projects, etc., all requiring more tree codes.

For that matter, does increasing the tree code limit to 512 codes 
instead of 256 actually put off the day of reckoning enough to be worth it?

- Brooks