Re; Maintaining, was: Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size

[Kazu Hirata]

Hi Ian,

>> I don't see why:
>>
>>    http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg02031.html
>>
>> was a bad thing.  i think gcc would have been better if it had just
>> been committed.
> 
> Not fair.  Zack himself says the patch is not recommended for commit,
> and it just a baseline for further work.  For this kind of target
> specific change, I think it is best to let the target port maintainers
> make the call.  I've CC'ed the maintainers listed for h8.  Perhaps
> they will take a look at it.

I am aware of the define_constraints patch.  I am thinking about working on 
the H8 and M68K ports at least.  How urgent is this?  FWIW, I've reproduced 
the ICE that Zack mentioned, but I haven't investigated it.

Kazu Hirata