I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable (union members and ctors)

[Ross Ridge]

Lawrence Crowl writes:
> On the specific topic of unions, there is a proposal before the
>committee to extend unions in this direction.  Let me caution you
>that this proposal has not been reviewed by a significant fraction
>of the committee, and hence has a small chance of being accepted
>and an even smaller chance of surviving unchanged.

This only supports my position.  If an active comittee member can't
get their proposal reviewed by a significant fraction of the committee,
then why should an outsider even bother?   You're better off posting a
patch to gcc-patches, at least that will have a chance of being seriously
considered.

					Ross Ridge