RFC: Rename Non-Autpoiesis maintainers category

[Diego Novillo]

I've always found the term Non-Autopoiesis too pretentious and
unnecessarily complex.  In a recent thread, Tobias Schluter proposed
Non-autonomous, which is at least more readily understandable.

Would this patch be OK?  Any other suggestions for a better category
name?  Is anyone violently opposed to changing the category name?


Thanks.


Index: ../MAINTAINERS
===================================================================
--- ../MAINTAINERS      (revision 126951)
+++ ../MAINTAINERS      (working copy)
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
 maintainers need approval to check in algorithmic changes or changes
 outside of the parts of the compiler they maintain.

-                       Non-Autopoiesis Maintainers
+                       Non-Autonomous Maintainers

 dataflow               Daniel Berlin           dberlin@dberlin.org
 dataflow               Paolo Bonzini           bonzini@gnu.org
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@


 Note that individuals who maintain parts of the compiler as
-non-autopoiesis maintainers need approval changes outside of the parts
+non-autonomous maintainers need approval changes outside of the parts
 of the compiler they maintain and also need approval for their own
 patches.