RFH: GPLv3

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:53:52PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> I don't think that's true.  Given that all copyrights are assigned to the FSF, 
> the FSF could license these changes as GPLv2+ (in 4.2) and GPLv3+ (in 4.3 and 
> up) without a problem.  The original author's wishes do not come into play.

I believe the key point here is that the FSF does not wish to do so.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery