RFH: GPLv3

[Diego Novillo]

On 7/12/07 11:43 AM, Richard Kenner wrote:
>> My personal preference would be to acknowledge that for our users
>> there is no significant difference between GPLv2 and GPLv3. 
> 
> I agree with this.  I think renaming 4.2.2 to 4.3.3 will result in
> lots of unnecessary confusion.
> 
Likewise.  As was suggested on IRC, we could append a letter to the
version number (say 4.2.2G) or something distinctive, but don't skip
version numbers in such an odd way.

It will be confusing and will give us no end of support headaches.