no_new_pseudos

Daniel Jacobowitz drow@false.org
Mon Jul 9 18:44:00 GMT 2007


Am I the only one who completely fails to see the point of the
spelling change?  I realize that you have said you find negative
predicates confusing - I don't, but I do find changing predicates
confusing.  I applaud cleaning up the definition and/or replacing it
with a macro, and I'd applaud adding some extra internals
documentation about it, but I think the fact that it's been called
no_new_pseudos for so long suggests that we should just leave it
called that if we want a predicate that means the same thing.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery



More information about the Gcc mailing list