Ian Lance Taylor
Fri Jul 6 17:51:00 GMT 2007

Richard Sandiford <> writes:

> That's why it seems so odd to me to want to get rid of the port uses
> and not replace it with something directly equivalent.  I just don't
> see how it qualifies as a clean-up.  I think tying the ports even
> more to reload-specific conditions, even when we already have a more
> abstract concept, is the wrong way to go.

At the risk of disturbing the bikeshed painting, what do you think of
this patch?

Lightly tested.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: foo.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 60822 bytes
Desc: Change no_new_pseudos to regalloc_started_p
URL: <>

More information about the Gcc mailing list