A reload inheritance bug

Bernd Schmidt bernds_cb1@t-online.de
Fri Jul 6 13:44:00 GMT 2007

Mark Shinwell wrote:
> Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>> Mark Shinwell wrote:
>>> Do you think it should be the case that, at the point below, _any_ 
>>> reload
>>> with reg_rtx corresponding to a hard register should have the relevant
>>> bit set in reload_spill_index?
>> I think so.  I'm attaching a patch below.  It appears to have no effect
>> on all code I've tried - does it fix your test case?
> As noted before, this does fix the test case; I've now regtested it
> on arm-none-eabi and there are no regressions.  Do you want to take
> care of applying it?

Thanks for testing.  I bootstrapped and regression tested it on 
i686-linux and committed it as 126415.  I'll put it on the 4.2 and 4.1 
branches in a week or so.

This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif

More information about the Gcc mailing list