Wow!
Richard Guenther
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 11:08:00 GMT 2007
On 7/3/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> On 7/2/07, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > I'm curious if it was the pre/fre changes. can you try -fno-tree-pre
> > > and -fno-tree-fre and see if it slows down again?
> > Adding -fno-tree-pre slows aermod back to 33.942s. Nice optimization. ;)
> Thanks.
> (You really should thank richard guenther and steven bosscher, who
> continually beat me up till i finished it :P)
>
Unfortunately, this "improvement" is a miscompare:
> Value= 2190.9357900 Target= 2191.1145000 Tolerance=0.10000000000E-02
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 34310.421880 Target= 34310.421880 Tolerance=0.30000000000E-01
> Value= 4260.5888700 Target= 4260.9716800 Tolerance=0.50000000000E-01
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 37093.921880 Target= 37094.375000 Tolerance=0.20000000000E-01
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 7924.6811500 Target= 7924.8842800 Tolerance=0.30000000000E-01
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 37093.921880 Target= 37094.375000 Tolerance= 1.0000000000
aermod FAILED 4 fails and 2 passes
Richard.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list