Wow!

Richard Guenther richard.guenther@gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 11:08:00 GMT 2007


On 7/3/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
> On 7/2/07, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > > I'm curious if it was the pre/fre changes.  can you try -fno-tree-pre
> > > and -fno-tree-fre and see if it slows down again?
> > Adding -fno-tree-pre slows aermod back to 33.942s. Nice optimization. ;)
> Thanks.
> (You really should thank richard guenther and steven bosscher, who
> continually beat me up till i finished it :P)
>

Unfortunately, this "improvement" is a miscompare:

> Value= 2190.9357900     Target= 2191.1145000     Tolerance=0.10000000000E-02
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 34310.421880     Target= 34310.421880     Tolerance=0.30000000000E-01
> Value= 4260.5888700     Target= 4260.9716800     Tolerance=0.50000000000E-01
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 37093.921880     Target= 37094.375000     Tolerance=0.20000000000E-01
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 7924.6811500     Target= 7924.8842800     Tolerance=0.30000000000E-01
FAIL <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> Value= 37093.921880     Target= 37094.375000     Tolerance= 1.0000000000

aermod FAILED    4 fails and    2 passes

Richard.



More information about the Gcc mailing list