Some thoughts and quetsions about the data flow infrastracture
Vladimir Makarov
vmakarov@redhat.com
Tue Feb 13 21:07:00 GMT 2007
David Edelsohn wrote:
>>>>>>Vladimir Makarov writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>
>Vlad> I did investigate the current status of the infrastructure on future
>Vlad> mainstream processor Core2 (> 11% slower compiler, worse code and bigger
>Vlad> code size). That is the reason why I started this.
>
> You do not believe that this is a concern of others? You do not
>believe that this will be addressed after the merge?
>
> This could be an example of GCC optimization becoming more
>aggressive with increased accuracy, causing increased register pressure
>problems, which is particularly detrimental to GCC for IA-32.
>
> Why don't we analyse and fix any problems instead of trying to
>keep GCC's infrastructure weak and stupid to cover up its inadequacies?
>Complaining about and blocking the merge of df does not solve the problem,
>it only delays it.
>
>
Once again. I am agree to stop this discussion. This is the last my
email on the thread. I just hope the thread was not waisting people's
time. If it is so I appologize for that.
More information about the Gcc
mailing list