ICE in langhooks.c on SPU

[Dave Korn]

On 28 August 2007 15:57, Revital1 Eres wrote:

>> Wow, you mean SPU has more builtins than x86_64?  Up the bitfield
>> width of tree.h tree_function_decl.function_code until it no longer ICEs.
>> 
> 
> Changing the following indeed solves the problem:
> 
> Index: tree.h
> ===================================================================
> --- tree.h      (revision 127857)
> +++ tree.h      (working copy)
> @@ -3312,7 +3312,7 @@
>       DECL_FUNCTION_CODE.  Otherwise unused.
>       ???  The bitfield needs to be able to hold all target function
>           codes as well.  */
> -  ENUM_BITFIELD(built_in_function) function_code : 10;
> +  ENUM_BITFIELD(built_in_function) function_code : 11;
>    ENUM_BITFIELD(built_in_class) built_in_class : 2;
> 
>    unsigned static_ctor_flag : 1;


  Heh, I thought I was being cautious when I suggested adding a check.  I
expected we might run into trouble in the future.  I guess the future is now!

  Defensive coding FTW!

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....