recent troubles with float vectors & bitwise ops

[tbp]

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> One option is for the user to use intrinsics.  It's been claimed that
> results in worse code.  There doesn't seem any obvious reason for that,
> but, if true, we should try to fix it; we don't want to penalize people
> who are using the intrinsics.  So, let's assume using intrinsics is just
> as efficient, either because it already is, or because we make it so.
I maintain that empirical claim; if i compare what gives a simple SOA 
hybrid 3 coordinates something implemented via intrinsics, builtins and 
vector when used as the basic component for a raytracer kernel i get as 
many codegen variations: register allocations differ, stack footprints 
differ, branches & code organization differ, etc... so it's not that 
surprising performance also differ. It appears the vector & builtin 
(which isn't using __m128 but straight v4sf) implementations are mostly 
on par while the intrinsic based version is slightly slower.
Then you factor in how convenient it is, well... was, to use that vector 
extension to write such something...

Another issue is that for MSVC and ICC, __m128 is a class, but not for 
gcc so you need more wrapping in C++ but if you know you can let some 
naked v4sf escape because the compiler always does the right thing with 
them.

Now while there's some subtleties (and annoying 'features'), i should 
state that gcc4.3, if you're careful, generates mostly excellent SSE 
code (especially on x86-64, even more so if compared to icc).

> We still have the problem that users now can't write machine-independent
> code to do this operation.  Assuming the operations are useful for
That and writing, say, a generic <int,float,double> something takes much 
much more work.

> What are these operation used for?  Can someone give an example of a
> kernel than benefits from this kind of thing?
There's of course what Paolo Bonzini described, but also all kind tricks 
that knowing such operations are extremely efficient encourages.
While it would be nice to have such builtins also operate on vectors, if 
only because they are so common, it's not quite the same as having full 
freedom and hardware features exposed.