Why is building a cross compiler "out-of-the-box" always broken?

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:06:03PM +0300, Kai Ruottu wrote:
> If one tries to produce everything in the 'gcc' subdirectory, including 
> 'libgcc',
> then headers may be needed.  But if producing only the 'xgcc', 'cc1', 
> 'collect2'
> etc binaries for the host is enough, then nothing for the target will be 
> required.

This is part of the reason why libgcc no longer lives in the gcc
directory.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery