Fwd: Re: Visibility=hidden for x86_64 Xen builds -- problems?

[H. J. Lu]

On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:45:38AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> 2) Why does the linker silently resolve the (32-bit PC-relative)
> relocation targeting an undefined weak symbol, yielding at
> run-time a non-zero address? While I can see the point of

Do you have a testcase? I can't reproduce it. If it is true, I consider
it a linker bug.


H.J.