Is PR21674 really fixed for gcc 4.2?

[Jack Howarth]

   I noticed that at least on Darwin PPC -m32 and -m64
we have been passing the test cases...

XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/char/21674.cc execution test
XPASS: 21_strings/basic_string/element_access/wchar_t/21674.cc execution test

in the libstdc++ testsuite. From what I see in bugzilla for PR21674, it
seems that it should be fixed on gcc trunk, right? Shouldn't the xfail
line be dropped now from those two test cases for the gcc 4.2 release?
             Jack