noise from gcc.dg/torture/fp-convert tests

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:

> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > 
> > > So, these are xfailed, but still produce quite a bit of noise on both
> > > x86_64-darwin and x86_64-linux since they fail to produce a working
> > > executable
> > > and then xfail. Should we move them to skip or link only and xfail them.
> > > With
> > > link only they do manage to be quiet in the logs and we'll still notice if
> > > they start linking correctly and can move them to run then.
> > > 
> > > thoughts? pre-approved? :)
> > 
> > Add a means to XFAIL the link of an execute test, if such a means doesn't
> > already exist in the testsuite infrastructure.
> 
> As opposed to changing the test to a link, find a way to xfail at the link
> stage instead of at the run stage?

Yes.  Some marking so that the compile/link is expected to fail (and so 
doesn't produce a WARNING) but if it succeeds (XPASS) then the execute 
test is run.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com