First cut on outputing gimple for LTO using DWARF3. Discussion invited!!!!

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 10:19:07AM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:45:34AM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> >   
> >> Given that Mark, and for that matter no one else,  did not really push
> >> back, I am pretty much committed not to use dwarf.
> >>     
> >
> > Then... what are you going to do about things like types?  Invent a new
> > serialization for those too?  I think that confusing dwarf-for-types
> > and dwarf-for-gimple would be a mistake.
> >
> >   
> My part is only the function bodies, we are still going to use dwarf for
> the types and the global variables.  There are people at codesoucery
> who, even as we speak, are busily enhancing that part to get all of the
> pieces output, not just the parts used for the debugger.

OK, violent agreement.  Thanks for clarifying.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery