expand_omp_parallel typo?

[Diego Novillo]

Marcin Dalecki wrote on 10/18/06 00:27:

>    bsi_insert_after (&si, t, TSI_SAME_STMT);
> 
> Shouldn't this bee
> 
>    bsi_insert_after (&si, t, BSI_SAME_STMT);
> 
> instead?
> 
Yes.  We lucked out because both symbols have the same numeric value. 
Patch pre-approved as obvious.


PS: Please do not use existing threads to start an unrelated one.