insv vs one-bit fields

[DJ Delorie]

Re-revisiting it...

> Revisiting an old thread...
> > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 09:40:20PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > So... why is it illegal to put a constant into a single bit field?
> > 
> > Probably because it was more efficient to use some other pattern
> > for some other target.
> 
> That's a bad reason to put it in the MI code, since the target could
> simply reject those requests itself.  Does anyone remember which
> target needed this?  If not, can we remove that test?

Nobody has said anything about this for the last two weeks.  Can we
remove this restriction now?