merges
Daniel Berlin
dberlin@dberlin.org
Thu Jan 12 00:12:00 GMT 2006
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> Giovanni Bajo wrote:
>> Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1@t-online.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Your merges are spamming the bugzilla database and anybody who is on
>>>> the CC list of the affected bugs.
>>>> both 20470 and 19199 got 1.2 Megabytes of ChangeLog.
>>>
>>> Argh. That's a side effect of the merge script I wasn't expecting.
>>> What do I need to do to fix this, and what exactly is causing it?
>>
>>
>>
>> You can avoid quoting ChangeLogs of patches your merge within your
>> branches'
>> ChangeLog. When working in development branches, usually ChangeLog files
>> are
>> not updated for merges, and commit entries are mostly like "merging from
>> trunk
>> up to revision NNNN". In other words, don't use svnmerge's generated commit
>> text file.
>
> Is it the commit message that's causing the problem, or the merged ChangeLog
> contents themselves?
Commit messages.
> The merge script relies only on the svnmerge-integrated
> property, not on the commit messages?
Right.
It's just trying to generate a nice message for you, but in our world, the
messages are so huge as to be useless.
>
>
> Bernd
>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list