Memory leak in bt-load.c ?

Philipp Thomas pth@suse.de
Tue Jan 10 16:39:00 GMT 2006

Previous message (by thread): Memory leak in bt-load.c ?
Next message (by thread): RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

* Christophe Jaillet (christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr) [20060109 20:00]:

> in file 'bt-load.c', in function 'augment_live_range', some memory is
> xmalloc'ed. It seems to be possible to never free it, if all the first tests
> are true.

This is now PR 25739.

Philipp

Previous message (by thread): Memory leak in bt-load.c ?
Next message (by thread): RFC: Why don't we stop the optimizer pipeline when errorcount > 0?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc mailing list