A questionable predicate in sh/predicates.md

Joern RENNECKE joern.rennecke@st.com
Mon Jan 9 15:42:00 GMT 2006


Kazu Hirata wrote:

> Notice that match_code at the beginning does not mention PARALLEL, but
>we have GET_CODE (op) != PARALLEL later.  Is this predicate intended
>to accept PARALLEL as well?
>
Yes, it is.

>If so, should we change the match_code at
>the beginning?
>
Yes.
 



More information about the Gcc mailing list