type layout bug, or not?

[Andrew Pinski]

On Feb 21, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> Is this the intended layout of this structure?  What does it mean when 
> a field runs off the end of the structure?  In this case, should I 
> just ignore the type size and assume that the 8 bytes are dynamically 
> there?

I wonder if this is the same problem as recorded as PR 22488.  To me it 
does sound
like the same issue.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski