i686 bootstrap failure in revision 110699: looping in
Andrew Pinski
pinskia@physics.uc.edu
Wed Feb 8 20:15:00 GMT 2006
>
> On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:28 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > >
> > > I've build in a unified (symlink) tree, with sourceware stuff checked
> > > out via cvs from date/time D2006.02.07.17.00.00
> >
> > I am reducing this failure and will file a bug report.
> >
>
> This failure is actually a latent bug elsewhere in marking statements
> annotations with volatile ops
>
> PRE doesn't touch statements that contain volatile operations because
> operand_equal_p claims two volatile operands are different, even if they
> look the same (which is the underlying cause of your infinite loop. We
> keep thinking we've generated new values because the hash lookup never
> finds the old ones because operand_equal_p returns false)
>
> All the other statements related to your volatile expressions have
> stmt_ann (stmt)->has_volatile_ops set to 1.
>
> yet
>
> (gdb) p ann->has_volatile_ops
> $18 = 0
> :(
I have a patch which is testing right now and I will apply it as pre-approved
(by Diego) once it has finishing testing.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
ChangeLog:
* tree-flow-inline.h (var_can_have_subvars):
Volatile variables should not have subvariables.
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fixvolatile.diff.txt
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20060208/6289f4de/attachment.txt>
More information about the Gcc
mailing list