GCC 4.0.2 and PR 23993

Benjamin Kosnik bkoz@redhat.com
Thu Sep 22 18:27:00 GMT 2005


> > I have. I am awaiting solaris test details.
> 
> Not very good: regressions on Solaris 2.6, 7, 8 and 9.
> 
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_allocate_big_per_type.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_delete.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/check_new.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-1.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_global_thread-3.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-1.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-3.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-1.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-2.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-3.cc execution test
> FAIL: ext/mt_allocator/tune-4.cc execution test

Yes, I saw this with Joe Buck's results yesterday. Further details have
not been available.

These new fails are annoying, but not release-critical, and seem to be
confined to Solaris. I'm not quite sure what is going on: can you send
me your libstdc++ log file please?

-benjamin



More information about the Gcc mailing list