zero sized initializers with side effects discarded

Olivier Hainque hainque@adacore.com
Fri Sep 9 14:27:00 GMT 2005


Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >      spinlock_t lock = (spinlock_t) { .raw_lock = one_raw_spinlock() };
> 
> What exactly is this code expected to do?
> Call one_raw_spinlock and then throw away the result?

 Yes. As you said, the result is nothing anyway, but the function should
 still be called IMO.

> If so, feel free to change gimplify_init_ctor_eval to do that.

 Thanks :)

 Thanks for your feedback.

 Olivier


 



More information about the Gcc mailing list