mips targets: seq_df, seq_sf

Nadezhda Ivanоvna Vyukova niva@niisi.msk.ru
Fri Sep 9 11:41:00 GMT 2005

Previous message (by thread): gcc-4.1-20050909 is now available
Next message (by thread): zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Please, explain, why mips.md specifies c.eq.d, c.eq.s instructions
in seq_df and seq_sf RTF templates? Why not c.seq.d and c.seq.s?

Seems, use of c.eq.d, c.eq.s causes violation of IEC 60559.

Best regards, 
Nadezhda I. Vyukova

Previous message (by thread): gcc-4.1-20050909 is now available
Next message (by thread): zero sized initializers with side effects discarded
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc mailing list