Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?

[Peter O'Gorman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Pinski wrote:
|> Won't you then get warning messages on Darwin every time someone tries
|> to use the installed library (since the symbol table timestamp will be
|> older than the file timestamp)?
|
|
| It will not be a warning on darwin, it will be straight error as
| Darwin's linker does not like the timestamp to be out of date at
| all.

Doesn't matter, the solution I applied to GNU libtool cvs last night is
probably most appropriate, i.e. chmod 644 before ranlib. I guess I'll look
at gcc cvs over the weekend to figure out where that would go in your tree.

Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBQxeQrLiDAg3OZTLPAQIZjQP9H3NKZd2r/AMNrqG+0pJ4WEdBgo8J/WUC
JZMY0l3JElo81UugL/2T5OOJvESmO6N5iiZj4blACg3m3cgPIuuFZ+K+UmV6rQW0
ypOauMYu6Un5SLlGV3KHm5qdLYqPPzyOLJfjCDvnNGcdBst0SG/jkfgiSAqq8hDt
c6YrkYmCWq0=
=dRag
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----