Heads up: many recent Fortran SPEC regressions
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Tue Oct 18 19:12:00 GMT 2005
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 01:47:33AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 12:39:14AM +0200, Paul Thomas wrote:
> > Have you made any progress on fixing this? I would rather that the
> > debug information is not available than that equivalence is broken.
>
> My mind is going. After checking 4 or 5 different trees wondering
> where the patch is, I noticed that I've checked it in already.
>
> 2005-10-15 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
>
> * gimplify.c (gimplify_var_or_parm_decl): Split out from ...
> (gimplify_expr): ... here.
> (gimplify_compound_lval): Use it in initial scan loop. Allow
> fb_lvalue in base expression.
>
> If it's still not fixed, I guess I'll have to look again...
Well, certainly the graphs on Diego's page returned ~ up to normal values
when you committed the fix.
Jakub
More information about the Gcc
mailing list