Need advice: x86 redudant compare to zero

Richard Kenner kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu
Fri Oct 14 01:03:00 GMT 2005


    My question is: where and how would you suggest we do this  
    optimization. With peephole2? Or in combine? In i386.md, I see  
    pattern *subsi_2 looks like what I'd like to combine these two insn  
    into:

    (define_insn "*subsi_2"
       [(set (reg FLAGS_REG)
         (compare
           (minus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,0")
                 (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "ri,rm"))
           (const_int 0)))
        (set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm,r")
         (minus:SI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2)))]
       "ix86_match_ccmode (insn, CCGOCmode)
        && ix86_binary_operator_ok (MINUS, SImode, operands)"
       "sub{l}\t{%2, %0|%0, %2}"
       [(set_attr "type" "alu")
        (set_attr "mode" "SI")])

    But I do not see a peephole2 that would generate this insn. Does  
    anyone know how this pattern is used?

This is the sort of thing you'd expect combine.c to make when it
combines an scc insn with arithmetic when the arithmetic result
is also used.



More information about the Gcc mailing list