Running ranlib after installation - okay or not?

[Peter O'Gorman]

Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2005, "Peter O'Gorman" <peter@pogma.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>>I posted a patch that nobody has had time to look at for this, even if
>>it is not acceptable (it would probably be better if it reset the
>>permissions after calling ranlib) I'd appreciate some feedback :)
> 
> 
>><http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-09/msg00201.html>
> 
> 
> I'd missed it, sorry.
> 
> The patch is ok, but it's not in yet because the format of the
> ChangeLog entries will require manual application in every one of the
> files, and that takes time.  If you'd repost the patch in a format
> that enables it to be installed with say cl2patch, or even with the
> raw ChangeLog diffs such that I use clcleanup and cl2patch to apply it
> to the current tree, I'll check it in when the mainline policy allows
> it.

Attached. Sorry I didn't do this in the first place.

Thank you,
Peter
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: 4-peter-run-ranlib.patch
URL: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/attachments/20051011/37e908e2/attachment.ksh>