RFC: redundant stores in C++

[Dale Johannesen]

On Oct 1, 2005, at 7:29 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> I don't think this will work for the following code:
>
> void foo(char a, char b) {
>   char x[4] = { a, b } ;
>   if (x[3] != 0)
>    abort ();
> }

Duh.  I thought that was too easy.

> But better fix would be not call split_nonconstant_init_1 for
> local decls and have the front-end produce a CONSTRUCTOR which is
> just like what the C front-end produces.

I'll try it.
\