Compiling GCC with g++: a report

[Andrew Pinski]

On May 24, 2005, at 12:01 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> Use of bare 'inline' is just plain wrong in our source code; this has
> nothing to do with C++, no two C compilers implement bare 'inline'
> alike.  Patches to add 'static' to such functions (AND MAKING NO OTHER
> CHANGES) are preapproved, post-slush.
That will not work for the cases where the bare 'inline' are used
because they are external also in this case.  Now this is where C99 and
C++ differs at what a bare 'inline' means so I have no idea what to
do, except for removing the 'inline' in first place.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski