tree ssa and type issues

[Daniel Berlin]

On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 22:00 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
> | > Parenthetically, I was wondering who is freeing those extensive
> | > regions of storage xmalloc/xcalloc()ed here and there?
> | 
> | 1. The people who write the code to do the xmalloc'ing.
> | 2. Every couple of months, people run gcc through valgrind with leak
> | checking on to make sure we arne't leaking the xmalloc'd memory.
> 
> If all memory is realized at the end of program, then obviously there
> is no leak, but that is not what I was looking for.

Then what are you looking for?

Some of the xmalloc's are hidden behind things like pool_alloc and
pool_free, which internally use xmalloc/free, etc.

> 
> But, it is nice to know that people run GCC through valgrind every
> couple of months.

You can even use valgrind during bootstrap to verify even the gc'd
memory is being used properly.

--enable-checking=valgrind

It should work for both the zone and page collectors (I know Daniel J.
was using it with zone to verify the zone collector was working
properly)


>   Do you know whether the have the resulst publically
> available somewhere?
No, i don't think anyone takes the extra effort to try to set up a web
page.


> 
> -- Gaby