Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

Paul Schlie <schlie@comcast.net> writes:

| > From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>
| > <rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
| > Subject: Re: Mismatched types in ADDR_EXPR from c-typeck.c:build_function_call
| > 
| > | Thereby all literal values are implied to be qualified as a read-only
| > | 'literal' object/reference, which has the semantics, that it may not be
| > | assigned/modified, but unlike 'const' may not be cast away; thereby for
| > 
| > If you cast away a const, you're still not allowed to modify the
| > object, so the compiler is still allowed to do the optimization.
| > Notice any type qualifier can be casted away, so introducing one does
| > not solve the problem, it just adds another complexity,
| 
| Unless a 'literal' qualifier is defined as being sticky; never "cast away".

Then, it is not a type qualifier.  It is something else, like
reference or pointer.  But not a type qualifier.

| (Eliminating the complexity associated with having to track and maintain
| READONLY tree attributes distinct from an object's declared qualified type?)

I dunno.  I have the impression that you're moving the problem from one
place to another, without reducing complexity.

[...]

| (I'll leave it be, but obviously wanted to try to plant another seed.)

:-)

-- Gaby