GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

[Robert Dewar]

Peter Barada wrote:

> Perhaps it is that the ELF executables are larger in total size(not
> code size) than the corresponding COFF executables, and if stored on
> the target, then the footprint increases, causing "larger memory
> requirements" of flash, not DRAM.
> 

Possibly, though I am surprised if the difference is significant,
assuming no debug information of course!